Week 7
MACS 30405: Exploring Cultural Space
University of Chicago
Annoucement
- The word-embedding notebook and exercise is released today.
- If you need extra time to work on exercise 4, please let me know.
- Office hours:
- for Python troubleshooting/debugging: Mon, May 6, 3 - 5 pm
- for final project: by appointment
- I haven’t read your exercise 1 & 2 yet. I’ll try to provide some feedback over this weekend.
- Readings for week 8 will be released today.
- You are expected to make an oral presentation of your final project at the last meeting of our class. The presentation should be about 10-15 mins long.
Garg et al. (2018)
- Using word-embedding models, the authors produce various time-series measures of gender/racial stereotypes in American English.
- Do you find their results reliable?
- Do you agree with their interpretations?What do the results say?
- What are potential problems of their measures?
Jost et al. (2009)
- Ideology as coherent ideas in people’s heads
- To what extent is ideology social?
- What constitute the core ideas of an ideology? What are accidental?
- Do ideological dimensions correspond to psychological dimensions?
- What are the top-down and bottom-up approaches?
- What are ideological dimensions? Why do we have non-orthogonal dimensions (economic vs. social-cultural)?
DW-Nominate in a nutshell
- was invented by Poole and Rosenthal
- is essentially very similar to PCA/CA but uses a loglinear estimation
- data: Congress roll calls
- goal: find out 1d or 2d ideal points that can best explain the votes
- Scholars usually find that a single dimension would suffice in distinguishing the voting outcomes
Question: Does the method really capture ideology?